Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

« Scuba Diving in the Utah Desert | Main | Working with AutoCAD Xrefs and Autodesk Vault »

18 February 2014


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Last week I did a number of tests with ReCap 360 capturing my 3D Connexion SpaceMouse Wireless. The results were the best I've had with any Autodesk Photogrammetry software. However, it has the height of the SpaceMouse ~30mm incorrecy. ~80mm instead of 54mm. Is the user expected to index the scale of the object within ReCap every time?

A small consumer electronic such as a mouse due to the shape/contour, surface texture, and size would not be ideal for any photogrammetry solution.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.